Actress Sneha wagh is a look alike of the google,tata sponsored school dropout cbi employee gujju housewife naina

For many television serials, a casual viewer cannot find out the names of the actors and actresses in the serial. Earlier the domain investor had mentioned that google,tata sponsored school dropout cbi employee gujju housewife naina, mother of two sons, who cbi falsely claims owns this website and other domains to waste indian tax payer money looks like the actress in veera and chandrasekhar.
Goa times carried an article on the actress Sneha wagh, and the name of the actress who looked like google,tata sponsored school dropout cbi employee gujju housewife naina, was confirmed
Many television serials and bollywood actresses look the many google,tata sponsored fraud raw/cbi employees falsely claiming to own domain names, to get a monthly raw/cbi salary at the expense of the real domain investor who is broke
Just because a very powerful government employee parmar is having an extra marital affair with school dropout naina, cbi is blindly believing his complete lies and wasting tax payer money paying her a monthly salary at the expense of the real domain investor.

Narrowminded Intolerant narcissitic internet sector officials refuse to acknowledge investment of women with flawed skin

Working online is a waste of time and money for women with flawed skin in 2018 because the extremely narrow minded regressive intolerant narcissitic internet sector officials bribed by google,tata are refusing to acknowledge the investment, effort and time spent by women who do not have perfect skin
In a clear case of discrimination, financial fraud, these powerful fraud officials who cannot be identified or held accountable, are falsely claiming that a fair skinned school dropout gujju housewife who has never invested a single paisa on domain names, owns the domain names of a single woman engineer to pay the gujju housewife a monthly salary at the expense of the domain investor

In a classic example of misgovernance in India that such narrow minded, prejudiced dishonest government employees are allowed to run amok and hire women for permanent government jobs based only on their complexion, skin quality , making 100% fake claims about their investment, while ruthlessly defaming, cheating and exploiting a woman domain investor who does not have perfect skin. If they did not want the ugly woman with a blotchy complexion to own the domain names, they should pay the market value and purchase the domain names, as long as they do not do so, it is a clear case of financial fraud.

The skin of a woman depends to a large extent on hereditary factors, and if government employees are refusing to acknowledge the investment of a woman just because she does not have perfect skin, they are violating the indian constitution which says that all indian citizens are equal.

Eating related website deindexed as part of website ownership fraud

Companies in the it and internet sector in India are extremely unethical and are openly involved in intellectual property theft, sex, bribery racket, banking, financial fraud with the help of ntro employees like j srinivasan who have the morals of a whore falsely claiming that google,tata supplied lazy greedy frauds, goan prostitutes like slim goan bhandari R&AW employee prostitute sunaina chodan, 2013 bsc, a flat chested version of actress mallika sherawat, who offers sex services to government employees, and done no work online, does not spend any money online, is owning the websites where the news of her fraud, sex bribes are posted

The real domain investor finds it very difficult to make any money online, as the vvip goan prostitutes are very good at motivating the ntro employees they are having sex with, to block all the payment, leads and orders of the real domain investor, whose identity has been stolen by the 10 google,tata sponsored goan prostitute, cheater housewife and other fraud raw/cbi employees faking a btech 1993 ee degree, domain ownership. So she is forced to develop some of the domains she had purchased earlier

The officials are justifying their identity theft racket making fake allegations of black money, forgetting the fact that every person has to spend some money on food, including the victim of google,tata’s prostitution racket, intellectual property theft , identity theft, banking fraud. So a review and listing with prices of food items, including food, however google,tata’s favorite goan bhandari panaji prostitute the lazy greedy R&AW employee sex worker sunaina chodan is least interested in eating food, because her extremely powerful sugar daddy mhow cheater puneet only likes very slim and good looking women,

The liar puneet falsely claims that being slim is an indication of fitness, and a slim woman can falsely claim to own the domains of another woman, without paying the market price. Though he knows that sunaina is not spending any money on domain expenses, the fraud puneet continues to make fake claims to pamper his favorite goan sex worker sunaina, defame, cheat and exploit the domain investor, google competitor, who actually owns the website, pays the expenses,

The fraud google,tata, ntro, goan government employees like pritesh chodankar have pampered google,tata’s favorite lazy greedy goan bhandari panaji prostitute sunaina chodan, that she is not interested in doing any kind of work at all, she is used to getting everything on a platter without doing any work at all except having sex with powerful men, because her google,tata pimps , sugar daddy ntro employees like j srinivasan, mhow cheater puneet, her relatives like pritesh chodankar are shameless and ruthless in marketing the prostitute as an online expert, domain investor

So when the domain on food was added to the ad network, it was indexed, however because google,tata’s favorite goan bhandari panaji prostitute sunaina, is not interested in food , the domain was deindexed in google a short period of time. Why are ntro, google,tata, R&AW falsely associating their employee google,tata’s favorite goan bhandari panaji prostitute sunaina chodan, with the google competitor , engineer who sunaina, her associates and her family hate and deindexing ?

The google,tata’s favorite goan bhandari panaji prostitute sunaina like other raw/cbi employees can easily purchase the domain paying the market price and get it legally transferred in her name, so why deindex the website just because the R&AW employee is not interested in food, or doing work online , the R&AW employee is only interested in having sex with powerful men as arranged by her pimps in google,tata ?

Now paypal ad features google,tata sponsored bespectacled indore document robber R&AW employee housewife veena look alike

Though google,tata sponsored bespectacled indore document robber R&AW employee housewife veena who looks like actress deepika padukone is only looking after her house and family, has never made any money online, has never invested any money online and does not have any paypal account of her own legally, the top ntro, indian internet sector, R&AW, cbi, google, tata are such frauds and liars that they have rewarded the indore bespectacled crook with a R&AW job for her crime under section 378 of the indian penal code on the google competitor, the domain investor legally owning this website

In July 2018, the paypal ad shown using google adsense on many website features a look alike of google,tata sponsored bespectacled indore document robber R&AW employee housewife veena, who has stolen the identity of the domain investor owning this website, google competitor with the help of fraud ntro employees led by the shameless cunning brutal mhow cheater puneet

An open question to R&AW, NTRO, indian government why does the bespectacled indore criminal R&AW employee housewife veena not open her own paypal account legally in her name in indore , how much money is indore criminal veena paying as BRIBES to top RAW, NTRO,indian government employees to abuse their powers and falsely claim that she owns the paypal account of the google competitor, her relative, a paypal account holder on whom she committed a crime under section 378 of the IPC